alt
2012-05-08 19:31

More than luck helps Australia beat US in beef war


By Kang Hyun-kyung

Why is Australian beef popular in Korea? It is more than its image of being clean and healthy with its cattle ranging free on vast farms, thereby avoiding exposure to feed that could cause bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease.

It requires history to explain because Australian beef got its foothold thanks to an import ban on American beef in 2003 when a cow in Washington State tested positive for BSE.

Its market share back then was a mere 15 percent, compared with 70 percent for American beef.

Aussie beef became top-selling imported beef from 2003 with a market share of 60 percent in 2010.

A industry source familiar with Australian beef said there have been ups and downs in terms of market share against American beef.

“It sold very well until the Korea-U.S. free trade agreement was ratified last year and after this, the market share of Aussie beef kind of stalled. It rebounded again after the recent California mad cow disease case,” the source said said.

But the question is why beef from other countries such as New Zealand has failed to repeat the Australian success.

A government official said no data was available to gauge if the mad cow disease had any effect on the market share of minor players such as Canadian or New Zealand.

Industry experts said consumers’ limited access is one reason why their market share is low.

John Hundleby, market manager of the Seoul branch of Beef and Lamb New Zealand, pointed his finger at the relatively small volume of beef import as a reason.

“The main reason probably is our export volume is much smaller than Australia. We supply beef between 30,000 to 40,000 tons each year for Korean consumers, but Australia exports much more than us,” he said. “Australian beef is much more readily available for Korean consumers.”

Some people familiar with Kiwi beef claimed that ineffective marketing may explain why its market share is much lower than Aussie beef.

They said Australian beef, not New Zealand beef, came first to mind to Koreans when talking about, pure and healthy beef, because of successful marketing.

Kiwi beef might have had higher consumption in Korea if ranchers or marketing people had launched a “clean and pure” campaign earlier than Aussie cattle ranchers did.

Korea is an important market for international ranchers. It was the third largest market for American beef before the outbreak of mad cow disease; and the fourth largest market for Canadian beef in 2003 before an import ban after a cow was confirmed to have been infected with the disease. Canadian annual beef exports here were valued at $50 million a year before the import ban.

Korea resumed importing Canadian beef cuts from cows younger than 30 months old from this January.

Hundleby from New Zealand said Korea is the second biggest market for Kiwi beef.




관련 한글 기사


호주산과 뉴질랜드산 소고기의 엇갈린 운명

캘리포니아 젖소에서 광우병이 발생한 이후 미국산 소고기 소비가 급감하면서 호주산 등 청정지역 소고기 소비가 늘고 있다. 농림부에 따르면 광우병 이후 한우 소비량도 줄었으며 4월말 기준으로 국내산 및 수입 소고기 소비가 전체적으로 8.7% 감소했다.

이런 추세에도 불구하고 호주산 소고기의 소비는 2.3%가량 증가한 것으로 나타나 눈길을 끈다.

호주산 소고기가 인기를 끄는 이유는 청정지역이라는 브랜드 마케팅과 광우병 발병이 없었다는 점, 그리고 대형마트에서 구입이 용이하다는 점 등이 작용했다는 분석이다.

미국산 소고기에서 광우병이 발생한 이후, 호주산 소고기의 판매증가는 청정지역이면서 광우병 발생이 없었던 뉴질랜드산 소고기의 소비에 커다란 변화가 없었던 점과 대조를 이룬다.

전문가들은 호주산이 대부분의 대형마트에서 판매되고 있으나 뉴질랜드산은 수입량이 상대적으로 적고 소비자이 대형마트 등에서 접근하기가 상대적으로 쉽지 않다는 점이 광우병 발병 이후에도 소비에 큰 변화가 없는 요인이라고 분석했다.


  • 1. Pains and joys of breastfeeding
  • 2. Woman confronts terrorists in London
  • 3. Singer rushed to hospital after apparent suicide attempt
  • 4. Ticks' attack
  • 5. N. Korea wants to resume 6-party talks
  • 6. 'No legal action against Psy imposter'
  • 7. N. Korea's special envoy Choe Ryong-hae meets Chinese president
  • 8. CJ chairman may face arrest
  • 9. LG to expand Google TV lineup
  • 10. Summer to sees sizzling comebacks


Copyeditors, cartoonist wanted
‘Expat citizen reporters’ wanted
Koreatimes.co.kr puts on a new dress